Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Making microbranches popular

[Tom Lord]

    > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:54:57 -0500
    > Cc: Tom Lord <address@hidden>, address@hidden
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    > Content-Disposition: inline
    > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
    > Blat: Foop
    > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
    > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
    >   mail.42inc.com
    > X-Spam-DCC: dcc.uncw.edu: mail 1201; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
    > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
autolearn=ham 
    >   version=2.61
    > X-42email-MailScanner-Information: Please contact 
http://www.42inc.com/support.html for more information.
    > X-42email-MailScanner: Found to be clean
    > X-UIDL: 4292a77c3fa8ab77682c4c8e009f88b2
    > 
    > 
    > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:54:31PM +0000, Mark Thomas wrote:
    > > Reorder `category--branch--version' to `category--version--branch'.  If 
we
    > > are popularising microbranches they *are* subordinal to versions, unlike
    > > the unrelated cartesian space that Tom has referred to before.
    > 
    > Christ man, _no they're not_.
    > 
    > All this crap (and specifically the above crap) was argued ad-nauseum on 
this
    > list a few months ago, and I have no wish to repeat the experience.
    > 
    > Look it up.
    > 

You put that so much more directly than I dare too :-)

-t