[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to l
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:48:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i |
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 06:43:11PM -0500, John Meinel wrote:
> Well, actually on many mailing lists there is a configure option for
> "don't CC an email from the list to me, if I'm already in the list of
> recipients."
>
> I use that on a couple other mailing lists I'm on, and it seems to work
> quite well. You can reply-all, and then the list takes care of not
> sending duplicates. If you log into
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users/
>
> The very last entry is "Avoid duplicate copies of messages?". Set that
> to Yes, it should help.
Actually that's the single *worst* result I have ever
encountered. Then you get one personal copy, and *no* list copies, so
no copy winds up in the list folder and there's not a damn thing you
can do about it (you receive no mails which contain enough information
to file them properly). Thread history is completely messed up.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, John Meinel, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, John Meinel, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Matthieu Moy, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/09/27