[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to l
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 05:50:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i |
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 07:03:10PM -0500, John Meinel wrote:
> >Actually that's the single *worst* result I have ever
> >encountered. Then you get one personal copy, and *no* list copies, so
> >no copy winds up in the list folder and there's not a damn thing you
> >can do about it (you receive no mails which contain enough information
> >to file them properly). Thread history is completely messed up.
> >
> >
> Actually, I have mine set to Yes, and I don't seem to have the
> catastrophic disaster that you seem to state.
>
> My mailer (Thunderbird) seems to handle things coming into my inbox, and
> then me manually moving it into the list folder.
I do not have a spare gnome to manually file all my mail.
> Also, if someone does "reply-all" then there still would be a
> 'gnu-arch-users' in the To or CC fields.
>
> I use the current procmail filter:
> :0
> * ^(To|Cc).*gnu-arch-users
> lists/gnu-arch-users
Filtering based on the inaccurate To/Cc fields is just wrong.
> Now, I still would prefer if gau set itself in the Reply-To so that the
> default reply goes to list.
Reply-To mangling considered harmful.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, John Meinel, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, John Meinel, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Matthieu Moy, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/09/27