[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source?
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:09:20 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:
> You may find that some things still don't work. For example, it used
> to be that "tla ancestry" insisted on contacting all the archives
> (even if all the patch-logs happened to be present locally); that may
> have been fixed. (It may also not be of interest to you; the
> fundamental operations like "get" will work.)
OK, thanks again. Overall, I just wanted to understand any risks
associated with ancestral archives "going away" for whatever reason.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4