gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar 1.2


From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar 1.2
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:35:43 +1100

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 15:44 +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Robert Collins:
> > The release includes:
> > * Aaron Bentleys backbuilder, which creates reference trees via both 
> > forward and reverse patching.
> > * Many UI changes
> > * Build fixes for Solaris
> 
> I can't get it to compile, at all on Solaris.  It was a bit of a pain on OS
> X but I managed it.  On Solaris, it fails to find its include files.

Which ones? mlh (copied on this mail) has been building it quite
successfully AIUI, with the patches I included from him.

> Update: it compiles if I manually add -I/.../src/baz to CFLAGS but it fails
> to find -lcrypto and -lssl (needed by neon).

mlh - any suggestions ?

> What I do not understand is that tla (1.1* and 1.2*) seem easier to
> compile...

tla includes the full path from the root of the src tree for the libarch
libraries. baz includes only the logical path (that is baz uses #include
"libarch/foo.h", tla uses #include "tla/libarch/foo.h"). I've seen p-f
bugs in this area.

Actually - thats a thought - is this a clean checkout? or an older one
(say baz 1.0) that you updated ? If the latter, check the whole config -
its likely you have an old package-framework checkout that will display
this problem.

Cheers,
Rob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]