[Gnu-arch-users] Re: MSFU and tla with openssh vs. plink

[Deliverable Mail]

Lode -- what do you mean by binary mounted -- mounted where, on cygwin
or linux?  Can you show how it should be mounted?

Do I have to use your versions of tar, diff, etc., as opposed to
cygwin's own, for your tla's?

Cheers,
Alexy


On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:59:09 +0100 (CET), address@hidden wrote:
> > I never got the dos83 versions to work, but I had good luck with the
> > dirnames versions. The 1.2.1 versions had a problem with line endings
> > and he doesn't seem to distribute the 1.2 versions (he might have fixed
> > the line ending, it turns out you need to give diff & patch the
> > '--binary' flag to make them work correctly.)
> 
> have you tried checking out into a "binmode" mounted directory?
> Also have your tools respect/maintain binary mode for the text files.
> 
> john, are you talking about the 1.2.1 on my page, or the one I sent
> you privately... ?
> 
> -- lode
> 
> PS: they're still on there, just not linked from the page...
> http://www.geocities.com/lode_leroy/arch/
> 
> tla-1.2-dirnames.tar.gz
> tla-1.2-dos83.tar.gz
> tla-1.2.1-dirnames.tar.gz
> tla-1.2.1-dirnamessrc.tar.gz
> tla-1.2.1-dos83.tar.gz
> tla-1.2.1-dos83src.tar.gz
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Plaats je zoekertjes GRATIS op AdValvas
> Placez votre petite annonce GRATUITEMENT sur AdValvas
> http://www.advalvas.be
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>