Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit

[Ulf Ochsenfahrt]

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 16:56 +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Deliverable Mail <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > "the idiot has just run me twice, well that's life, just go on and
> > do it, there's no reason in dissuading him anyhow"...:)
> 
> What tla says about your second commit is more: "The intelligent guy!
> he noticed that he could add a log entry without making any change by
> running tla commit twice. Let's obey!".
> 
> In practice, I'm not sure anyone other than Tom use this "feature",
> but that's life.

I do. Regularly. I sometimes mess up the log message of the previous
commit and then just commit another log message. But maybe that's
because I'm special. ;) I even thought about moving the repository to a
write-once storage medium.

Cheers,

-- Ulf

> There have been some discussions about adding a --no-empty-commit or
> whatever to tla, that could be enabled by default by wrappers, but I
> think no one bothered to implement it up to now.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part