[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879 |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:23:16 -0400 |
No I'm just confused because you are sending out mixed signals.
If it is ok to support Real Player then it must also be ok to support
Emacs integration packages to other proprietary software.
These cases are not all similar. See the GNU coding standards for an
explanation of these issues.
Like Visual
C++ or Adobe Photoshop, Right?
Since those programs are well known, it is not out of the question
to support them. Whether it is a good idea or a bad one is a question
of tactics, that depends on the details in each case.
Emacs will already work with any C++ compiler, through compile.el.
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/01
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, David Hansen, 2007/07/16
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/16
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, David Hansen, 2007/07/17
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, David Hansen, 2007/07/18
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/19
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, David Hansen, 2007/07/19
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/19
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, David Hansen, 2007/07/19
- Re: realplay.el interface with Real Player v. 1879, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/21