[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Attorney fees

From: Hyman Rosen
Subject: Re: Attorney fees
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:34:57 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080213)

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
And what are those non-technical "violations" successfully
> litigated in court by SFLC?

The purpose of the enforcement activities is so that when
a binary GPL-licensed program is distributed, the vendor
distributes the sources as well. The purpose of the SFLC
actions isn't to successfully litigate, it's to have the
GPL be followed.

Do you know of an instance where the SFLC has dropped a
case and the GPLed source code remained unavailable? In
the Actiontec case, the manufacturer is making the GPLed
sources available.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]