[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Rahul Dhesi
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:42:12 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: nn/6.7.0

Rjack <> writes:

>>>> References, please. Why would one need registration to get 
>>>> standing?
>>>> Were you maybe confusing between jurisdiction and standing?
>>>> Even so, references, please.
>> How about a good law article from the SSRN or one of the online
>> law reviews?

>Use your mouse Rahul. Use your mouse.

If you are sure that standing requires copyright registration, try
a Yahoo or Google search for: article III standing

The first few hits will show that standing comes from the "cases and
controversies" clause of Article III section 2 of the US constitution,
and not from copyright registration. In particular, Cornell's Annotated
Constitution (both Yahoo and Google include this in the first few hits)
has plenty of citations, in case you are looking for some to use later. :-)

Also, here's a law review article that discusses standing in the
context of a circuit split:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]