Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Hyman Rosen]

Rjack wrote:
> the SFLC always *voluntarily dismisses*
> their own bullshit case before a judge can rule on anything.

And yet in each case, the goals pf the SFLC are accomplished.
The GPLed sources are made available by the defendants or their
agents.

> THE SFLC WILL NEVER, NEVER VOLUNTARILY ALLOW A JUDGE TO REVIEW THE
> MERITS OF THE GPL LICENSE. It's bullshit FSF propaganda Hymen. Which
> part of b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a don't you understand?

This is what you wish to believe, but that does not make it true.
So far, in each and every case, the GPLed sources have been made
available. In the Verizon case, Actiontec prominently features
icons of free software on its downloads page.