[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:52:40 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)

"amicus_curious" <> writes:

> "David Kastrup" <> wrote in message
> 851vtr64ch.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:851vtr64ch.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
>> "amicus_curious" <> writes:
>>> "David Kastrup" <> wrote:
>>>> "amicus_curious" <> writes:
>>>>> but that is meaningless to me.
>>>> Laws don't depend on you seeing a meaning in them.
>>> Who is talking about the law?
>> The judges, and you can read in the subject title that this thread is
>> about laws and their interpretation in court.
> Well that subject line was long ago.  What I am saying is the the SFLC
> and its client BusyBox are just wasting the world's time.  Perhaps
> they have a legal right to do that, but it is still nonsense and at
> the end of the day they will be remembered as being egotistical fools
> who just wasted the people's time.

Do you happen to have a mirror at home?  It is a common reflective
household item.  Just curious.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]