[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: amicus_curious
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:04:45 -0500

"David Kastrup" <> wrote in message 85ab8brg9a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:85ab8brg9a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
"amicus_curious" <> writes:

"Thufir Hawat" <> wrote in message
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:51:24 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

But the BusyBox authors are totally willing to give their work away and
have been doing so for years.  The only thing that they are hammering
their users in regard to is for not publishing the acknowledgement and
code itself on the user's own site.

Exactly, if you choose to distribute *their* work then there are
conditions.  What's wrong with that?

The conditions are silly and useless, making the authors appear to be
the same.

So what?  You don't seem to have much of a problem with being silly and
useless, certainly being much more so than the BusyBox authors.

But I am not suing companies for such trivia. And you can only muster some inane slurs in response? That is pretty lame.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]