[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Thufir Hawat
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:35:55 GMT
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:52:22 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

>> You're begging the question.  Your "conclusion" is that the source need
>> only be available if it's been modified, and, since the source wasn't
>> modified, then it need not be available.
> I am not arguing the meaning of the text contained in the GPL, I am
> saying that, unless the code has been modified in some useful way, then
> it is of no value to the community.

So you don't dispute the legality of the GPL?  You're just find it 
inconvenient?  If so, then don't distribute GPL'd software and go about 
your business.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]