[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Peter Köhlmann
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:19:59 +0100
User-agent: KNode/0.99.01

amicus_curious wrote:

> "Rahul Dhesi" <> wrote in message
> news:go0i73$nuv$
>> Rjack <> writes:
>> [ still arguing promissory estoppel ]
>>>> How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise?
>>>"2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
>>>of it...
>> Permission alone is not a promise.  What is the writer of the GPL
>> promising to do or not to do?
>> --
> The leap here is the phrase "thus forming a work based on the Program".

The only leap here is the one your two (slightly rotten) braincells are 
Another name for a Windows tutorial is crash course

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]