[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: Peter Köhlmann
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:45:30 +0100
User-agent: KNode/0.99.01

Alexander Terekhov wrote:

> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> > They are correct Hymen. Section 2(b) is an *illegal* contractual
>> > term.
>> Just for the sake of playing with you: if that were a case, the legal
>> document would be invalid.
> Dak, dak, dak. Are you still in Germany? Don't you know that resulting
> from Harald Welte's "enforcement" actions in Germany, the courts ruled
> that the GPL falls under

Fine. You might try to present a link for that claim
Posting a link to some courts decision which has obviously nothing to do 
with the GPL hardly counts as "evidence" of anything. Except for the 
suspicion that you are lying, again

< snip unsupported claim >
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
        Let it get in YOUR way. The problem for your problem.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]