[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More FSF hypocrisy

From: Rjack
Subject: Re: More FSF hypocrisy
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:09:50 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20090302)

Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:04:54 -0400, Rjack wrote:

Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:32 -0400, Rjack wrote:

All EULA would be contracts, yes? Not complying with an EULA opens up a can of worms.
Depends on whether the EULA is ultimately found by the courts to be enforceable or not.

Do please generalize as to whether other EULA are, or are not, contracts in your view.
All EULAs are contracts.

So, when an EULA is ignored, the usual response is copyright infringement, right?

If the EULA is legally enforceable it could constitute breach of
contract or copyright infringement (or both) depending on the terms
of the particular EULA under consideration.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]