Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Rjack]

Thufir Hawat wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:04:54 -0400, Rjack wrote:
>
> > Thufir Hawat wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:32 -0400, Rjack wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > > All EULA would be contracts, yes?  Not complying with an 
> > > > > EULA opens up a can of worms.
> > > > Depends on whether the EULA is ultimately found by the 
> > > > courts to be enforceable or not.
> > >
> > > Do please generalize as to whether other EULA are, or are 
> > > not, contracts in your view.
> > All EULAs are contracts.
>
>
> So, when an EULA is ignored, the usual response is copyright 
> infringement, right?

If the EULA is legally enforceable it could constitute breach of
contract or copyright infringement (or both) depending on the terms
of the particular EULA under consideration.