[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Jacobsen v. Katzer settled
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:06:38 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/23/2010 2:13 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> >> The use here is copying and distribution, which infringes
> >> in the absence of any license agreement at all.
> >
> > Providing or not providing attribution is not copying you moron, it's
> > providing or not providing attribution. Take your meds, Hyman.
> The license grants permission to copy and distribute provided
> certain conditions are met while doing so. Copying and distributing
> while not meeting those conditions is copyright infringement. Those
> conditions can be anything - attribution, paperback format, blue
> covers. If the copier does not want to meet the conditions, he has
> no right to copy.

Hyman you retardedly confuse conditions precedent with scope
restrictions and covenants to do (or not do) something "while doing so".

Take your meds Hyman. Take your meds.


P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system 
so that I can do the builds."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]