[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A drunken judge in the SDNY

From: Alan Mackenzie
Subject: Re: A drunken judge in the SDNY
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:00:45 -0000
User-agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386))

In gnu.misc.discuss c_stuff <> wrote:
> On 8/22/2010 1:01 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

>> Of course not.  How is stating that you're mistaken got anything to
>> do with Erik Andersen?  More precisely, you're probably mistaken
>> about the applicability of the court decision you cited.  Anyhow, as
>> I've already said, if you're right, then the defendants will appeal
>> and get their money back.

> Besides thin air, what's your basis for stating I'm mistaken? Even Hyman
> Rosen attempts to document a few of his assertions.

When you disagree with an acknowledged expert in legal matters (the
judge), something you do quite a lot of, it's likely you're mistaken
rather than the judge.  Unless, of course, you are an acknowledged legal
expert yourself, something I asked you which you failed to answer.

> Sincerely,
> RJack :)

Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]