[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:43:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 14:35:56 -0800, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
> On 2020-02-22 18:58, Amin Bandali wrote:
>> "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769@kylheku.com> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> You are sick.
>>
>> I urge you to consider the GNU Kind Communications Guidelines [0] when
>> posting to GNU lists, as well as keeping this list's guidelines [1] in
>> mind when posting here.
>
> I sincerely believe that the code of conduct document published
> on the gnu.tools is the product of a sick mind.
>
> Make no mistake: this is not name-calling; I stand by it.
To approach this from a constructive perspective: rather than claiming
someone to be "sick", state your opinion of the symptoms, and debate
those.
But more importantly, and taking precedence: it's irrelevant to the
discussion. Whether or not you believe someone to be "sick" because
they hold a particular viewpoint---which I find to be a terrible
mistake---doesn't matter to the topic at hand. Consequently, raising it
could only be interpreted as an insult, since it can do nothing to
further a constructive debate.
So as a moderator, I'm asking that you please stop.
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Taylan Kammer, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/25
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/26
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Amin Bandali, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Mike Gerwitz <=
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/22
- Re: lese majeste, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: lese majeste, orbulon, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22