gnue
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clients and financial years


From: darrow
Subject: Re: Clients and financial years
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:38:15 -0500 (EST)

I thought it meant Application Service Provider.


On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Kenneth D. Reiszner wrote:

> I realize that I am a dunce when it comes to acronyms in the computing field 
> so I
> routinely use Babel to enlighten me. Unfortunately although I have seen ASP 
> many
> times in the literature I have yet to see it defined and the definitions 
> given by
> Babel in this instance are I think unsatisfactory.:
> ASP       Active Server Page [Microsoft] +
>           Authorized Service Provider +
>           Association of Shareware Professionals
> .ASP      Active Server Page (file name extension)
> 
> If you could enlighten me it would be most helpful. Additional enlightenment
> might answer the question when do you thing that gnue will be able to be used 
> as
> a rudimentary accounting program for simple invoicing and possibly statement
> generation.
> 
> As an end user I am most grateful for what you and the gnue team are doing. 
> If I
> can help in any way I feel free to call upon me.
> 
> Kenneth Reiszner, Ph.D., President
> REAL, Inc.
> PO Box 709, 41 Hwy. 167 S. (shipping)
> Lecompte, LA 71346
> PH & FAX: 318-443-0426
> 
> 
> Neil Tiffin wrote:
> 
> > At 9:35 AM +0100 3/24/01, Reinhard Müller wrote:
> > >1. Multiple clients (I mean several different companies running a single
> > >installation of gnue)
> > >I see 3 possibilities:
> > >a) A database per client: simplest solution, but several drawbacks:
> > >Tables cannot be shared between clients, data can not (easily) be copied
> > >between clients, current databases systems tend to loose performance
> > >with many active databases and so limit the number of clients.
> > >b) A set of tables per client, with the client number being a part of
> > >the table name (e.g. supply_chain__base__item01): AFAIK some systems go
> > >this way, but I don't know if I like it personally. Not sure about
> > >advantages and disadvantages. Not sure about how many tables may be in a
> > >database.
> > >c) A single set of tables where data of all clients sit, with every
> > >table containing a field with the client id.
> >
> > I think that company should be part of the database structures.  For
> > companies that operate internationally it is typical to have to do
> > accounting on many companies and at the same time run the supply
> > chain as if all of the companies were one company.
> >
> > For this to work, security must be considered.  I see two scenarios here:
> > a) companies have to be completely separate.  this would apply to ASP
> > or others running multiple companies on the same system and the
> > companies are really separate.
> > b) multiple companies who have separate accounting but really operate as 
> > one.
> >
> > And of course you may have both (a) and (b) for an ASP.
> >
> > I think it is important to have reports and forms that can work
> > across financial companies.
> >
> > Neil
> > address@hidden
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnue mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnue mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]