Re: [gnugo-devel] test results after removing Pattern CD106

[Evan Berggren Daniel]

Looks good to me, but I'm really not the one to ask ;)

In general, we use diff -u (unified diffs) instead of standard diffs.
Also, you might want to use CVS to keep more up to date; for this sort of
thing it won't make a huge difference, but you're less likely to run into
problems.  Cygwin should ship with CVS; if not you can certainly download
it.  The recommended way to run regressions is 'make all_batches' from
within the regression directory; this will print out unexpected results.
Said results are updated at every cvs tag and devel release.

Evan Daniel

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, kevin yong wrote:

>
> Hi, Evan:
>
>   i ran 2 full regression tests before/after pattern
> CD106 from patterns.db. it correct the problem from
> 13x13b:27. this time it gives right answer C4. the
> removal of pattern CD106 has no effects on other test
> results.
>
>   all i did was quite simple: comment out pattern
> CD106. run each .tst file, and output into 2 log
> files:
> log1 hold all detailed log from inside gnugo, while
> log2 only holds the result of output from command
> input, like:
> input:
>
> # B2 inefficient way to live.
> loadsgf games/mertin13x13/GMGN2.sgf 92
> 27 gg_genmove white
> #? [C4]*
>
> output:
>
> =27 C4
>
> i only run 'diff' on the log2 files. among all log2
> file for all .tst file, only difference found is
>
> 107c107
> < =27 C4
> ---
> > =27 B2
> 211c211
> < =10003 48662488
> ---
> > =10003 48662491
>
> and i run 'diff' on the patterns.db before/after
> modification:
>
> 11456,11457c11456,11457
> < #Pattern CD106
> < ## db added (3.1.7)
> ---
> > Pattern CD106
> > # db added (3.1.7)
> 11459,11462c11459,11462
> < #?x?          make an eye (or die trying!)
> < #O*O
> < #O.O
> < #oOX
> ---
> > ?x?          make an eye (or die trying!)
> > O*O
> > O.O
> > oOX
> 11464c11464
> < #:8,d
> ---
> > :8,d
> 11466,11469c11466,11469
> < #?x?
> < #O*A
> < #OaA
> < #bOX
> ---
> > ?x?
> > O*A
> > OaA
> > bOX
> 11471c11471
> < #; does_defend(*,A)
> ---
> > ; does_defend(*,A)
> 11473,11474c11473,11474
> < #> replace(a,*);
> < #> if (!o_alive_somewhere(b)) replace(b,*)
> ---
> > > replace(a,*);
> > > if (!o_alive_somewhere(b)) replace(b,*)
>
>   i m using gnugo3.3.17
>
>   like to hear your advice.
>
> kevin.
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnugo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>
>