[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x + (y) + z
|
From: |
Frank Heckenbach |
|
Subject: |
Re: x + (y) + z |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 09:55:16 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
semail 20050101 |
Derek M Jones wrote:
> Unfortunately glr parsing is not a universal solution. It requires that
> at the end of processing there be a unique parse tree (the multiple
> parse trees that may exist while processing the input tokens are required
> to eventually resolve to a single parse).
Have you looked at `%merge'?
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, address@hidden
http://fjf.gnu.de/
GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)
- Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/04
- Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/06
- Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/06
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/06
- Re: x + (y) + z,
Frank Heckenbach <=
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/08
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/09
- Ambiguity involving two parse stacks reducing on the same rule, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/09
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/06
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/07