[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x + (y) + z
From: |
Derek M Jones |
Subject: |
Re: x + (y) + z |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:42:23 +0000 |
Frank,
>> Unfortunately glr parsing is not a universal solution. It requires that
>> at the end of processing there be a unique parse tree (the multiple
>> parse trees that may exist while processing the input tokens are required
>> to eventually resolve to a single parse).
>
>Have you looked at `%merge'?
That option has the limits on its use as %dprec.
derek
--
Derek M Jones tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667
Knowledge Software Ltd mailto:address@hidden
Applications Standards Conformance Testing http://www.knosof.co.uk
- Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/04
- Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/06
- Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/06
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/06
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z,
Derek M Jones <=
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/08
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/09
- Ambiguity involving two parse stacks reducing on the same rule, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/09
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/06
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/07
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/07