[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unmaintained package?
From: |
Bob Rossi |
Subject: |
Re: unmaintained package? |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:21:10 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Bob Rossi wrote:
>
> > Am I correct in assuming that both flex and bison are unmaintained? or
> > is there an active community working on these projects?
>
> Bison is certainly maintained as you can see in the mailing list archives.
Hi Joel,
Well, who would I talk to about modifying bison to be used in an
asynchronous manner? I found this Email from 2002
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-bison/2002-06/msg00038.html
which is *exactly* the problem that I'm having. So, it appears that this
has been a feature of bison that has been needed for several years.
Unfortunately, I can't see the Email address's in that post because they
are modified to address@hidden I was wondering what ever
became of that patch. I would also like to talk to the person, to
determine what the outcome of his efforts were.
I would appreciate some assistance in this area.
Thanks!
Bob Rossi
- unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/15
- Re: unmaintained package?, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/15
- Re: unmaintained package?,
Bob Rossi <=
- Re: unmaintained package?, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/18
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/19
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/19
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/20
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/20
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/22
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/29
Re: unmaintained package?, Hans Aberg, 2005/12/19