[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: common lisp vs elisp.
From: |
2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE |
Subject: |
Re: common lisp vs elisp. |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jun 2021 20:42:39 -0700 |
On 2021-06-20 at 11:26:43 +0800,
Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 11:13 AM Emanuel Berg via Users list for the
> GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
[...]
> > Common Lisp (or CL, 1984) is the industrial-strength Lisp
> > while Emacs Lisp (or Elisp, 1985) is the Emacs
> > domain-specific Lisp.
>
> So, the following questions come to my mind:
>
> 1. Does this mean that the former is a superset of the latter?
No.
> 2. What's the standard compiler/debugger for the latter on *nix platforms?
There's not really a standard. That's one of the great things about
*nix (as opposed to POSIX). :-)
If you want a free solution, the de facto environment is SBCL
(https://sbcl.org) and SLIME under Emacs.
For a commercial solution, try Allegro
(https://franz.com/products/allegrocl/).
Both implement CLtL2 and have an ANSI standards compliant mode.
- common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp.,
2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE <=
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Stefan Monnier, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Joost Kremers, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Andreas Eder, 2021/06/27
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/27
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/28