[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: common lisp vs elisp.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: common lisp vs elisp. |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jun 2021 00:04:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE@potatochowder.com [2021-06-19 20:42:39] wrote:
> If you want a free solution, the de facto environment is SBCL
> (https://sbcl.org) and SLIME under Emacs.
Indeed.
> For a commercial solution, try
Please don't advertise/promote proprietary products on FSF-managed mailing
lists, thank you,
Stefan
- common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., 2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Joost Kremers, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Andreas Eder, 2021/06/27
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/27
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/28
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/20