[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: common lisp vs elisp.
From: |
Hongyi Zhao |
Subject: |
Re: common lisp vs elisp. |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jun 2021 12:44:39 +0800 |
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 12:04 PM Stefan Monnier via Users list for the
GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> 2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE@potatochowder.com [2021-06-19 20:42:39] wrote:
> > If you want a free solution, the de facto environment is SBCL
> > (https://sbcl.org)
I can't open <https://sbcl.org>, the working website is
<http://www.sbcl.org/>, based on my tries.
> and SLIME under Emacs.
Basically, this means that I can replace ielm with slime
(https://github.com/slime/slime) for more comprehensive and advanced
functionality.
>
> Indeed.
Thank you for letting me know this fascinating thing.
>
> > For a commercial solution, try
>
> Please don't advertise/promote proprietary products on FSF-managed mailing
> lists, thank you,
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
HY
--
Assoc. Prof. Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com>
Theory and Simulation of Materials
Hebei Vocational University of Technology and Engineering
NO. 552 North Gangtie Road, Xingtai, China
- common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., 2QdxY4RzWzUUiLuE, 2021/06/19
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Stefan Monnier, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp.,
Hongyi Zhao <=
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Joost Kremers, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Hongyi Zhao, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Andreas Eder, 2021/06/27
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Emanuel Berg, 2021/06/27
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/28
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/20
- Re: common lisp vs elisp., Jean Louis, 2021/06/20