[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
From: |
Moritz Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
Date: |
27 Aug 2001 01:57:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Right, but he should get that port by doing a retry, not by having
> shadowfs look it up in the real directory.
Ah, so shadowfs should provide a retry _name_ if the file is found, it
should not do the lookups itself and provide a retry _port_?
> Importantly, that would get the permissions wrong.
No, not if shadowfs made the needed checks.
moritz
--
Moritz Schulte <moritz@chaosdorf.de> http://www.chaosdorf.de/moritz/
Debian/GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org/ http://www.gnu.org/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
- Re: ShadowFS (status), (continued)
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Moritz Schulte <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Steven Barker, 2001/08/27
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/27