[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 19:09:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 06:21:54PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> 2. Use one server thread per user. Then any user can only DOS-attack
> his or her own processes.
As the paper says, this just requires that N clients collaborate in an
attack, where N is the maximum of server threads allowed by the system.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, (continued)
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Andreas Haeberlen, 2003/06/03
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/06/03
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Niels Möller, 2003/06/03
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Espen Skoglund, 2003/06/03
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Niels Möller, 2003/06/03
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Kip Macy, 2003/06/06
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Niels Möller, 2003/06/02
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Jean-Charles Salzeber, 2003/06/02
Re: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/06/02
RE: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Volkmar Uhlig, 2003/06/02
RE: Vulnerabilities in Synchronous IPC Designs, Volkmar Uhlig, 2003/06/02