[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement
|
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement |
|
Date: |
Tue, 02 May 2006 03:03:35 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Mon, 01 May 2006 20:57:06 -0400,
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 00:10 +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
>
> > > These extra requirements are not realistic. The owner of the computer
> > > (the faculty) wants things to work. "We cannot touch the quota" is not
> > > a valid argument.
>
> Marcus: as with hospitals, you have absolutely no conception of the real
> operating conditions that apply in academia.
You mixed me up with Bas.
Thanks,
Marcus
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, (continued)
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/01
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/02
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/03
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/03
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/05/01
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/01