Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement

[Tom Bachmann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> Trivial confinement is profoundly
> (and deliberately) weaker. This may actually be good for Marcus's
> objectives, but it seems useful to understand precisely what is being
> lost technically, and what impact this may have in practice.
> 
> So I will start a new thread for this first.
> 

This is great. I'd like to say that all this discussion has been
extremely confusing.
I tried to sketch it a bit at
http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Hurd/HowMuchConfinementDoWeWant.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEViTFvD/ijq9JWhsRAio8AJ4/6nRVHGcHy02JGg5q58tCFKYhDACfYjx/
wI/zvvOYxuK/QJeFu8mppWQ=
=A72l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----