[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement
|
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
|
Subject: |
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 May 2006 20:11:08 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Scribit Bas Wijnen dies 02/05/2006 hora 19:44:
> > My point is that the TCB includes stuff that needs updating, and may
> > need updating on a regular basis as bugs are discovered.
> The TCB should be pretty stable.
Please state what the TCB includes. None of you two has the same
definition of it. I suspect Bas only sees the boot system and the
ยต-kernel along with some very low-level components of the OS. Wether
device drivers fit in there is unclear. Surely not the network stack.
Semantically,
Nowhere man
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, (continued)
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/05/01
- RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/01
- RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/01
- RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/01
- RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/02
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/02
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/02