[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement
|
From: |
Christopher Nelson |
|
Subject: |
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 May 2006 13:11:01 -0600 |
> Scribit Bas Wijnen dies 02/05/2006 hora 19:44:
> > > My point is that the TCB includes stuff that needs
> updating, and may
> > > need updating on a regular basis as bugs are discovered.
> > The TCB should be pretty stable.
>
> Please state what the TCB includes. None of you two has the
> same definition of it. I suspect Bas only sees the boot
> system and the ยต-kernel along with some very low-level
> components of the OS. Wether device drivers fit in there is
> unclear. Surely not the network stack.
The TCB includes everything that *must* be trusted. The kernel, most (if not
all) drivers, and certain servers. Which servers depend on your architecture.
-={C}=-
- Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, (continued)
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/02
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement,
Christopher Nelson <=
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Jeremy Shaw, 2006/05/02
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
RE: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/02
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Sam Mason, 2006/05/17