[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]]
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]] |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:09:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 03:52:12PM CET:
> |
> | One reason why you should keep `--install' in the flags even after
> | the first run is that when you later edit `configure.ac' and depend on
> | a new macro, this macro will be installed in your `m4/' automatically.
> | Another one is that serial numbers can be used to update the macros in
> | your source tree automatically when new system-wide versions are
> | installed. A serial number should be a single line of the form
> |
> | #serial NNN
> |
> | where NNN contains only digits and dots. It should appear in the M4
> | file before any macro definition. It is a good practice to maintain a
> | serial number for each macro you distribute, even if you do not use the
> | `--install' option of `aclocal': this allows other people to use it.
Is there a technical reason to break current nonstandard practice for
packages? Why not
#serial NNNN [garbage-ignored-by-aclocal]
?
Failing that: How about choosing a different name. I fear #version is
so common that it might already exist as text in some m4 files.
Regards,
Ralf
- serial in branch-1-5, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]],
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/02/01
- Re: serial in branch-1-5 [[and branch-2-0]], Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/01