[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Porrectus (continued)
From: |
Rune Zedeler |
Subject: |
Re: Porrectus (continued) |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:23:33 +0100 |
Den 02-Jan-02 skrev Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
JN> Until there's a dvips fix, there are two things you can do: hack
JN> something up in metafont, eg, add another (short) ledger line (or
JN> two). Or maybe, introduce a 'blotfilledbox' into tex.scm that uses
JN> the PostScript "draw_box" routine; and use that for ledger lines. It
JN> may be that the rounding problem is not visible if the x-alignment of
JN> ledger lines proves to be not as critical as with stems.
Well, a third "thing" to do (ugly, I know, but with the dvips bug you cannot
avoid ugly hacks) would be to let filledbox combine a nice rounded box out of
two \vrule's (forming a cross) and four blots (in the corners of the cross).
-Rune
- Re: [PATCH] Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued),
Rune Zedeler <=
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/03
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Juergen Reuter, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/07
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/16
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/01/31
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/31