[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Porrectus (continued)
From: |
Rune Zedeler |
Subject: |
Re: Porrectus (continued) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jan 2002 02:47:47 +0100 |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Maybe best to just add a blot-diameter circle to the feta font. If
> you do it in PS, you'll get the same dvips alignment trouble we're
> trying to avoid. See staccato-dot or so.
I tried that.
I did
fet_beginchar("blot","blot", "blot")
pickup pencircle scaled blot_diameter;
drawdot (blot_diameter/2,0);
set_char_box(0, blot_diameter#, blot_diameter#/2, blot_diameter#/2);
fet_endchar;
When I invoked metafont with
mf "\mode=\proof; mag="`guile -c "(write (/ 600 2602))"`";" input
feta20.mf
producing a 600dpi gf file, the result of the blot was this (one X = one
pixel):
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
Why is the blot-diameter so small - it seems pointless with all this
fuss when the result in 600dpi nevertheless will be a perfect rectangle.
Well, the blot-diameter actually should depend on the resolution - but
is that possible?
-Rune
- Re: [PATCH] Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/03
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Juergen Reuter, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued),
Rune Zedeler <=
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/16
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/01/31
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/31