[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Porrectus (continued)
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Porrectus (continued) |
Date: |
08 Jan 2002 15:34:03 +0100 |
Rune Zedeler <address@hidden> writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> > Maybe best to just add a blot-diameter circle to the feta font. If
> > you do it in PS, you'll get the same dvips alignment trouble we're
> > trying to avoid. See staccato-dot or so.
>
> I tried that.
Thanks. I'll have to look into this later.
> Why is the blot-diameter so small
The only real requirement is for the printout to look as much as
beautifully engraved music as possible. Sharp edges are noticeably
ugly.
> - it seems pointless with all this fuss when the result in 600dpi
> nevertheless will be a perfect rectangle.
arg, there's no point if this is the case -- but this should/can never
happen; it must look roundish. We should check this.
> Well, the blot-diameter actually should depend on the resolution - but
> is that possible?
In metafont that's automatic, I guess. But what we do in postscript
should be linked to that... There are more of this kind of problems,
stem thickness is another problem.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: [PATCH] Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/03
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Juergen Reuter, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/07
- Re: Porrectus (continued),
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/16
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/01/31
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/31