[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Porrectus (continued)
From: |
Juergen Reuter |
Subject: |
Re: Porrectus (continued) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 18:36:14 +0100 (MET) |
On 3 Jan 2002, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Rune Zedeler <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Well, a third "thing" to do (ugly, I know, but with the dvips bug you cannot
> > avoid ugly hacks) would be to let filledbox combine a nice rounded box out
> > of
> > two \vrule's (forming a cross) and four blots (in the corners of the cross).
>
> Now that's a smart hack. It also has some advantages to have TeX draw
> stems and ledger lines.
>
Actually, that was my first approach: drawing two overlapping rectangles
(or, if you prefer, three non-overlapping rectangles) and adding filled
circles, as shown below for the upper left corner.
--+--------------+
/ | \ |
! | ! |
+---+--------------+---+
! | ! | |
!\ | / | |
! --+-- | |
! | | |
! | | |
+---+--------------+---+
| |
| |
+--------------+
The problem is the circle, which is currently supported neither by
lookup.cc, nor by tex.scm, ps.scm, pdf.scm etc. I could give it a try,
but that probably would take quite a while, since I had to study
ps, pdf etc. in detail. Are there any volunteers that already know
about ps, pdf, etc. and could just provide a filled circle via
lookup.cc? :-) (We will need circles anyway as soon as we introduce
contemporary graphical notation into lily.)
Actually, I succeeded in drawing a bezier-sandwich that looks like a
half-circle, but a true circle would be nicer.
Greetings,
Juergen
- Re: [PATCH] Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/02
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/03
- Re: Porrectus (continued),
Juergen Reuter <=
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/04
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/07
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/08
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/01/16
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/01/31
- Re: Porrectus (continued), Rune Zedeler, 2002/01/31