Re: markup{} vs TextScript

[Mats Bengtsson]

Related to the answer on \mark versus \markup that I just sent,
I don't fully agree on the change below, since \markup can be
used in several different contexts, not just for text scripts.
Examples
\header{ title = \markup{...} }

\property Staff.instrument = \markup{...}

\lyricsmode{ Here is a flat sym -- bol: \markup{\flat } }

\mark \markup{...}

c4^\markup{...}

   /Mats


Graham Percival wrote:
> On 10-May-05, at 10:16 AM, Stephen wrote:
>
> > Thinking about it even more, I realise that having a link to 
> > TextScript in the programming reference somewhere under 7.4 Text 
> > markup instead of just under 5.7.5 Text scripts to make up for the 
> > confusion in terminology that Text script and Text markup are two 
> > terms that basically describe the same thing.
>
>
> Thanks, this is a useful report.  Fixed in CVS.
>
> I can (and will) certainly update the docs to reflect this, but would it 
> be possible
> to standardize the lilypond internals?  Could "TextScript" be renamed to
> "TextMarkup" and "TextScriptEvent" be renamed to "TextMarkupEvent" ?
> I think that's a better solution than renaming \markup{} to \script{}.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================