[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:41:28 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Pedro Kröger wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > We could steal the users directly from there... But for this to
> > happen, we would have to reverse engineer the SCORE format.
>
> hum, it's a binary format right? I've forgotten that.
I once saw a program handling SCORE files which was not from the original
SCORE developer (I think it was something to output PostScript), and it
said that the whole format is made up of IEEE format binary floats. That
should help, together with examples.
Anyway, I am certain that people willing to input into SCORE will *love*
LilyPond, since it has a more intuitive syntax, and the output quality is
similar, if not better.
Ciao,
Dscho
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, (continued)
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/20
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/20
- Page breaks, was: something else, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/22
- Re: Page breaks, was: something else, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/22
- Re: Page breaks, was: something else, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/22
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration,
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/18
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18