[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:01:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.1 |
On Thursday 18 August 2005 14.13, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > Did you try \pageBreak? :) IMHO, perfect page breaks is one of the things
> > that
>
> \pageBreak, did we have that? :-)
>
> Yes, I tried, but I thought it was a lot of hassle. It would ease up
> things if lily produced line breaks in places where a page break is
> sensible.
I have been thinking about this issue. There are two problems with "sensible"
page breaks:
1. Page breaks are only critical when you need to turn pages. If you don't
need to turn a page, it's better to use the current algorithm.
Page breaks _often_ happen every second pagebreak, but not always. (sometimes
you may have 3 visible pages at once, sometimes 2). Also, it's always unclear
whether the first page will be a left or right page so you'd have to
communicate that somehow. That communication would probably be about as much
work as inserting a \pageBreak.
2. When there is no good page break (such as in orchestral scores), no effort
should be done to find the 'optimal' one, we should just be greedy (this can
of course be done)
For these reasons, I would vote strongly against having clever pagebreaks
turned on by default. It could be nice as an option, though.
--
Erik
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, (continued)
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Heikki Junes, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration,
Erik Sandberg <=
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/20
- Page breaks, was: something else, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/22
- Re: Page breaks, was: something else, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/22
- Re: Page breaks, was: something else, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/22
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/18