[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tremolo positioning
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Tremolo positioning |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:43:30 +0200 (CEST) |
> It seems this issue doesn't bother anyone else? In any case, now
> that 2.8 is out there, I thought I'd start pushing this point again.
> I attach a patch that gives the behaviour that I think is correct.
> I also attach 2 examples of the differences between the existing and
> the proposed behaviours.
Hmm, the Tchaikovsky solution is still incorrect -- some stems are too
short, causing a collision with the note heads... It's a different
bug, but it would be nice if it could be solved at the same time.
Werner
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/27
- Re: Tremolo positioning,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/28