[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tremolo positioning
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Tremolo positioning |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 04:48:45 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:43, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > It seems this issue doesn't bother anyone else? In any case, now
> > that 2.8 is out there, I thought I'd start pushing this point again.
> > I attach a patch that gives the behaviour that I think is correct.
> > I also attach 2 examples of the differences between the existing and
> > the proposed behaviours.
>
> Hmm, the Tchaikovsky solution is still incorrect -- some stems are too
> short, causing a collision with the note heads... It's a different
> bug, but it would be nice if it could be solved at the same time.
I've tweaked it by adding a little more to the minimum length of the stem. The
Franck output is unchanged, I've attached the new Tchaikovsky output.
Oh, and I remembered a ChangeLog entry this time :)
>
>
> Werner
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
tremolo_20060328.patch
Description: Text Data
tchaik_try2.jpeg
Description: JPEG image
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/27
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/27
- Re: Tremolo positioning,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joshua Parmenter, 2006/03/28