Re: finished second draft?

[Francisco Vila]

2008/8/13 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> 1) At the end of Single staff polypohony:
>
> "This is a better construct to keep control of the voices, for example,
> to ease a consistent assign of lyrics to the proper voice context."
>
> might be better worded as
>
> "This construct keeps a voice alive throughout the polyphonic section.
> For example, this allows lyrics to be assigned to one consistent voice."
>
> 2) In order to make this more clear, I'd recommend using an example.
> Here's the one I put together to make sure I understood the manual.
>
> @lilypond [guote, verbatim, relative =1]
> <<
>  \new Staff {
>    \context Voice = "mel" {
>      c4
>      <<
>        {
>          \voiceOne g' g
>        }
>        \new Voice {
>          \voiceTwo e e
>        }
>      >>
>      \oneVoice
>      g
>    }
>  }
>  \new Lyrics \lyricsto "mel" {
>    This is my song.
>  }
>>>
> @end lilypond

Thank you, done in my branch with the added suggestion from Trevor. I
have put \new Voice instead of \context Voice, that way I have not to
explain why. Do you think there is a good reason to do it right here?

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org