|
From: | Trevor Daniels |
Subject: | Re: Lilypond problems |
Date: | Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:07:49 -0000 |
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:14 AM
Am Samstag, 13. Dezember 2008 02:48:14 schrieb address@hidden:On Fri, Dec 12, 2008, Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> said: > Should we change \bar "." to create a single > thick barline for reasons of consistency and instead add a new > bar line style \bar "dot" to create a single dot as a bar line? newbies dumb Q - will the switch impact extant user files?I don't think so. If you look at what \bar "."produces, ie. \version "2.11.65" \relative c' { c4 \bar"." c4}(image is attached) then you'll see that such a "barline" doesn't make muchsense at all.
I vaguely remember seeing such a dot used to separate the two parts of a bar in compound time, much like the common dotted or dashed barline, but I can't find an example. Can anyone else?It's possible I'm thinking of the identical symbol used to indicate pointing in psalms, but \bar "." can't be used for that in LilyPond - the dot is placed in
the associated staff rather than the Lyrics. Trevor
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |