[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:18:54 +0100 (CET) |
> Or should we require the user to make his own definitions each time
> (s)he wants to use these accidentals? Which of these methods should
> be included in the news file as an example for the recommended
> syntax?
I'm in favour of this solution, at least temporarily. Given that 2.12
is coming soon, arrowed accidentals should be documented somehow,
together how a user can get them.
Werner
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Maximilian Albert, 2008/12/09
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/12/09
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Trevor Bača, 2008/12/10
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Maximilian Albert, 2008/12/12
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/12/13
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Trevor Bača, 2008/12/14
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/12/14
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Maximilian Albert, 2008/12/16
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Trevor Bača, 2008/12/17
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Maximilian Albert, 2008/12/18
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Maximilian Albert, 2008/12/20
- Re: PATCH: Arrowed accidentals for microtone notation, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/12/22