Re: Patch for stylesheets

[Till Rettig]

Patrick McCarty schrieb:
> I have considered keeping the soft blue for the links, but here are my
> two main reasons for changing to the more "pure" blue:
>
> - The current blue (#3465a4) does not pass the WCAG 1.0 against a
> white background.  Based on experience, the new blue definitely
> increases readability, even though the current "soft blue" might be a
> *nicer* color.  Since LilyPond's documentation is so extensive, I
> think the increase in readability is a plus.
>
>   
Yes it's true about readability, but what if there would be stille some 
blue 'in between'. Maybe it is only my lcd screen?
> - With the current soft blue, it is difficult to distinguish *links*
> from *black text* if link underlining is turned off in the browser.
> Since the new blue is more contrasting with the black text in
> div#main, this would no longer be an issue.
>   
what if they would be underlined in the text? One could argue that if 
the user want's to switch it off he can distinguish also more subtle 
contrasts...

till
> I want to use the softer blue for something else besides text, but I
> haven't yet decided where to put it, thus its absence from this patch.
>
> Thanks for your comments,
> -Patrick
>
>