[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for stylesheets
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: Patch for stylesheets |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:01:39 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:02:44PM +0200, Till Rettig wrote:
> Patrick McCarty schrieb:
>> I have considered keeping the soft blue for the links, but here are my
>> two main reasons for changing to the more "pure" blue:
>>
>> - The current blue (#3465a4) does not pass the WCAG 1.0 against a
>> white background. Based on experience, the new blue definitely
>> increases readability, even though the current "soft blue" might be a
>> *nicer* color. Since LilyPond's documentation is so extensive, I
>> think the increase in readability is a plus.
>>
>>
> Yes it's true about readability, but what if there would be stille some
> blue 'in between'. Maybe it is only my lcd screen?
I have changed the color of the blue links again, except for the
footer, which needs the brighter blue to remain readable. It is very
close to the current blue, but I like this new blue better since it is
less "washed out". The patch is attached.
Current style:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/index.html
New style:
http://uoregon.edu/~pmccarty/texi2html/lilypond-index.html
Is this better for you, Till? Does anyone else have any more
comments?
Thanks,
Patrick
0001-Docs-Update-default-stylesheets.patch
Description: Text document