[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug or feature?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Bug or feature? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:41:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
"Carl D. Sorensen" <address@hidden> writes:
> On 3/8/09 6:10 AM, "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi, I have no idea whether or not the following result is user error or
>> a misfeature. When typesetting the following, in the transposed variant
>> some chord diagrams are pretty, some chord diagrams are absurd. Is this
>> supposed to actually work? If not, what is?
>
> This is a bug. What you have done should work, but it doesn't. The bug
> occurs because the transpose changes the octave of the d chord to d', so the
> predefined fretboard doesn't apply any more and it calcuates an automatic
> fretboard.
>
> Please file a simple bug report. I have a potential solution in mind, and
> hope to get it fixed in the next week or so.
The most straightforward thing probably would be to generally transpose
so that the lowest note sits in a default octave before doing the chord
recognition for the fretboard engraver.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Bug or feature?, (continued)
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/10
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/10
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/10
- Re: Bug or feature?, Graham Percival, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Valentin Villenave, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/03/11
- Re: Bug or feature?, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/11
Re: Bug or feature?,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Bug or feature?, Carl Sorensen, 2009/03/14